You really want to take it there?
May. 19th, 2009 06:00 pmRandom wiki-surfing on history and religion. Stumbled across something on Nithing.
If the accused did not retort by violent attack, either right on the spot or by demanding holmgang, yielding either the challenging accuser to take his words back or the accuser's death, he was hence proven to be a weak and cowardly nithing by not retorting accordingly
And then you gonna turn around and act "ZOMG they're going to show up and hurt me?"
Really?
Don't call up old traditions you don't want to be a part of.
ETA: That should not be taken as a threat, but rather WTF would you say that and then act like you're the victim?
If the accused did not retort by violent attack, either right on the spot or by demanding holmgang, yielding either the challenging accuser to take his words back or the accuser's death, he was hence proven to be a weak and cowardly nithing by not retorting accordingly
And then you gonna turn around and act "ZOMG they're going to show up and hurt me?"
Really?
Don't call up old traditions you don't want to be a part of.
ETA: That should not be taken as a threat, but rather WTF would you say that and then act like you're the victim?
no subject
Date: 2009-05-20 02:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-20 02:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-20 04:58 am (UTC)Also interesting "Angry" originally meaning "Unmasculine" and here we are, and anger = maleness all around...
no subject
Date: 2009-05-20 02:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-20 02:52 am (UTC)Also I've witnessed disquisitions by some of those connected one way and another to those who employed that word, about that word, one of whom is a Ph.D. in Old English. They know very well.
Love, C.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-20 03:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-20 03:17 am (UTC)yrs--
--Ben